Medicine stands still, 1000-1500

Causes and explanations

Physiology

Physiology is 'the study of how the body works' ... and medieval scholars had little idea about how the human body worked. 

•   They accepted from Ancient Greek writers (primarily Hippocrates and Galen) the Theory of the Four Humours – that the body comprised four 'humours' (bodily fluids) and that these determined, not only health, but personality. 

•   They realised that the heart pumped blood, but thought the muscles burned it up as fuel.   They believed that the arteries carried both air and blood. 

•   They theorised that 'vital spirits' from the air permeated into the blood through the liver, influencing muscles and nerves, sight and emotions. 

•   Many medieval physicians believed that the seat of emotions was the bowels (hence 'gut feeling'). 

•   They were flummoxed by the brain.  Some medieval physicians followed the Greek philosopher Aristotle, who held that the heart was the centre of thoughts and feeling and that the brain was an organ which cooled the blood (thus 'hot-headed').  Others believed that the vital spirits flowed from the heart into the brain, where they were transformed into thoughts, feeling and movement.  Galen taught that the brain was the location of the soul.

•   They misunderstood even the basics of conception.  They did not know about eggs or the role of the sperm in fertilization.  Another idea was that the left testicle produced a female baby and the right a male. 

•   They believed that the womb could wander around the body – if it rose into the chest, it was the cause of hysteria (from the Greek word hystera, 'womb')

•   They believed that astrology, demons and supernatural influences controlled people's lives. 

Going Deeper

The following links will help you widen your knowledge:

Basic account from BBC Bitesize

  The significance of The Theory of the Four Humours

  The significance of Hippocrates

Case Study: The Black Death

- BBC Sounds on Hippocrates and Galen

YouTube

 Mr Cloke on the Theory of the Four Humors, Hippocrates, Galen and the Causes of Disease

Source A

The Travels of Sir John Mandeville (1356), describing the wonders he encountered on an alleged journey to China, including fantastic human beings.  The book remained authoritative until c.1600.

Source B

Homo Signorum ('Man of Signs') a zodiac man from the Guid of Barber-Surgeons, c.1486, showing the parts of the body dominsated by the various astrological divisions.

Source C

A medieval urine chart from Germany, c.1506.  One way that doctors would determine a ptient's humours was by checking the colour, thickness, smell and taste of the patient’s urine. 

Pathology

Pathology is 'the study of how causes of disease' ... and medieval scholars had little idea about what caused disease. The result was a bewildering and contradictory array of ideas including:

1.   The Theory of the Four Humours – as propounded in the works of Hippocrates and Galen.  Was the person cold or hot, wet or dry and, given this, which of the four bodily humours (blood, phlegm, yellow bile or black bile) had got out of balance? 

2.   Astrology – became more important as the Middle Ages progressed, especially after the Black Death. 

3.   Pestilential (or corrupted or putrefied) air – people were aware of the connection between disease and smell, but blamed the smell for the disease. 

4.   Contagion – medieval doctors also realised that some diseases were contagious, but were not aware how.

5.   Divine punishment – diseases such as leprosy were regarded as a punishment for the patient’s sin, epidemics as a punishment for society’s sins. 

6.   Supernatural signs and evil spirits.  Epilepsy was widely believed to be caused by demonic possession or evil spirits entering the body; ergotism (a very painful disease caused by eating moudly rye and called 'St Anthony's Fire') was believed to be a test of faith from God.

7.   Jews and witches – Jews might be accused of poisoning the wells; old women of casting bad spells. 

Diagnosis

Medieval ideas about the causes of disease are a huge overlapping muddle. 

If you had trained at Oxford University, you had probably read a textbook called Ars Medicinae ('The Art of Medicine', sometimes called the Articella: ‘Little Art’) – a compilation of extracts from the Greek doctors Hippocrates and Galen, together with passages on urine and the pulse.  Other common texts included Avicenna’s Canon (‘collection’) and compendiums of medical knowledge by English writers – the Rosa Anglica (‘English Rose’) by John of Gaddesden, and Compendium Medicinae by Gilbert of England (Gilbert’s section on childbirth and gynecology was circulated as a separate book: The Sickness Of Women). 

Ordinary practitioners carried a Vademecum (‘Go-with-me’) – a quick-reference flip-book of strips of parchment containing the position of sun and moon when the illness began; the planet ruling the afflicted body part; the Sphere of Apuleius (which used the patient's name to predict whether they would live or die); the zodiac man and a roundel of different colours of urine. 

Medicine was seen as an ‘art’ – a skill not a science.  As you will see when you study the Black Death, a doctor might use ALL the above ideas and his natural intuition to diagnose the cause of the disease, and to decide the best treatment. 

Determining factors:

Communication – the Dark Ages had seen the loss of medical learning.  After 1000, Arab Christians set about translating the texts of Greek authorities such as Hippocrates and Galen, and these translations (very) slowly began to be used in universities across Europe.  There is little evidence that this knowledge ‘trickled down’ to ordinary practitioners. 

Science and learning – books like the Articella, Canon and Rosa Anglica were typical of medieval learning (compiling and organising existing knowledge).  Hippocrates and Galen were simply incorporated (mistakes and all) into a huge often-contradictory body of information and doctors picked and chose as they wanted.  Diagnosis was seen as an ‘art’; it was in no way a ‘science’ as we know science … which is why it was all wrong. 

Attitudes: Faith – Christianity was important in the acceptance of Galen, because he believed in one God, which pleased the Church.  Other influences were wholly negative – blaming the patient for their sin, or Jews and witches, or evil spirits. 
People’s belief in the supernatural also spilled over into astrological theories which iteself sent medicine down a 500-year wrong turning. 

Attitudes: Authority – the acceptance of authority over even the evidence of your own eyes made it difficult-to-impossible to change anything.  The 13th century French surgeon Henri de Mondeville realised that Hippocrates and Galen were 'old dogs that needed putting down', but even he used their methods: “he probably wouldn’t have found employment otherwise” (Stark & Thorne, 2016 – as they point out, there were no alternative ideas available). 

Spotted an error on this page?  Broken link?  Anything missing?  Let me know.